Leukocyte Variations in Gestational Hypertension: An Immunohematological Review

Authors

  • Chinedu-madu Jane Ugochi Department of Haematology, Faculty of medical laboratory science, Federal university Otuoke, Otuoke, Bayelsa State, Nigeria Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64229/fhec3n89

Keywords:

Gestational Hypertension, Leukocytes, Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, Monocytes, Systemic Inflammation, Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

Abstract

Gestational hypertension (GH) is a hypertensive condition of pregnancy characterised by the emergence of hypertension after 20 weeks of gestation, in the absence of proteinuria or systemic organ involvement. Although preeclampsia has been thoroughly studied, the modifications in leukocytes associated with gestational hypertension have garnered relatively little attention, despite common immunological mechanisms. Physiological pregnancy is characterised by leukocytosis, mostly induced by neutrophilia, alongside relative lymphopenia, which indicates an innate–adaptive immunological transition. In GH, data suggests further enhancement of these alterations, encompassing raised total white blood cell (WBC) counts, an increased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte activation, and heightened systemic inflammatory indices. These results correspond with a condition of increased maternal systemic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and placental maladaptation. This review integrates contemporary literature regarding leukocyte changes in GH, examines the processes responsible for leukocyte-mediated vascular injury, assesses the therapeutic relevance of haematological indices, and underscores future research trajectories. Leukocyte-derived markers may function as economical supplementary tools for growth hormone risk classification, although necessitate disease-specific validation.

References

[1]Magee LA, et al. Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2022;30:85–112.

[2]Ives CW, Sinkey R, Rajapreyar I, Tita AT, Oparil S. Preeclampsia—Pathophysiology and clinical presentations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(14):1690–1702.

[3]Bellamy L, et al. Pre-eclampsia and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life. Lancet. 2007;370(9599): 1119–29.

[4]Mor G, Cardenas I. The immune system in pregnancy: a unique complexity. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2010;63(6):425–433.

[5]Xue X, et al. Maternal white blood cell counts and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23:287.

[6]Zhou W, et al. Association between maternal leukocytosis and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2022;30:31–38.

[7]Ooi DS, Greenway DC, Fok KF. Leukocyte counts in pregnancy. Clin Biochem. 1998;31(6):405–408.

[8]Sacks G, et al. Normal pregnancy and preeclampsia both produce inflammatory changes in leukocytes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(1):80–86.

[9]Myatt L, Roberts JM. Preeclampsia: pathogenesis and implications for cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(7): 621–634.

[10]Wang, Y., Gu, Y., Philibert, L., & Lucas, M. J. (2001). Neutrophil Activation Induced by Placental Factors in Normal and Pre-eclamptic Pregnancies In Vitro. Placenta, 22(6), 560–565. https://doi.org/10.1053/plac.2001.0691

[11]Laresgoiti-Servitje E, Gomez-Lopez N, Olson DM. An immunological insight into the origins of preeclampsia. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16(5):510–524.

[12]Wang Y, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and preeclampsia risk: a meta-analysis. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2020;22:20–28.

[13]Serin S, et al. NLR as a predictor of preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2016;6(1):22–25.

[14]Yücel B, Ustun Y. Hematological indices in preeclampsia: meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(8):978–983.

[15]Yavuzcan A, et al. Evaluation of NLR in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2014;36(7):470–473.

[16]Harmon AC, et al. Monocyte activation in preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(1):38.e1–38.e8.

[17]Lokki AI, et al. Persisting monocyte alterations after hypertensive pregnancy disorders. Front Immunol. 2022;13:903306.

[18]Oylumlu M, et al. Monocyte/HDL cholesterol ratio and preeclampsia risk. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(9):1526–1531.

[19]Fan X, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index and preeclampsia risk. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2021;24:95–101.

[20]Şimşek G, et al. Neutrophil/HDL cholesterol ratio in preeclampsia. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2020;42(1):27–31.

[21]Sun X, et al. Systemic inflammation response index in hypertensive pregnancies. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2022;41(1):25–34.

[22]Wang O Hematological predictors of hypertensive disorders: review. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2020;21:54–63.

[23]Levine U. Circulating angiogenic factors and risk of preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(7):672–683.

[24]Hahn, S., Stavros Giaglis, Hoesli, I., & Hasler, P. (2012). Neutrophil NETs in reproduction: from infertility to preeclampsia and the possibility of fetal loss. 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2012.00362

[25]Zeisler H, et al. Predictive value of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(1):13–22.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-20

Issue

Section

Articles